Thursday, April 9, 2009

Toxic Media Fuels A Down Economy


Did you read it? Did you hear the good news? No? That doesn't really surprise me. When we are bombarded with such constant negativity by a media that thrives on posting "Toxic Headlines" it is only natural that when we read positive news that comes out, it does nothing to improve our spirits or outlook on the economy. This is due to the fact that for every positive article in the News Paper or on the Internet News source, there are at least dozen negatives ones that overshadow it.

Just today alone we see the great news about Housing starts, which if you haven't read the article on MSN or CNBC, then I will quick you a quick snap shot. For first time in nearly a year something positive in on the news, Housing Starts & Building Permits were up! Does this mean end of the recession is nearing? Not likely, however it is a sign that the things are starting to improve. It's kind of like the first signs of life after a long hard cold winter where everything has been frozen for so long and one day you walk out to your car to go to work and you notice a tree starting to show just the slightest hint of a tiny bud trying to break through the ravaged old wood and show signs of life.

However that news along with the other positive article that came out about about American Economy is Finally Showing Signs of Recovery on CNBC. This article told of small improvements with consumers not swarming but inching their ways back towards shopping malls. They also noted in this article that while they do not feel the recession is over as of yet, the fear or shock factor of past months is dulling the consumer and like all war survivors they are picking themselves up and finally starting to dust off. OK, maybe I interjected some of my own interpretation of the article, but it isn't too far from the truth.

The public can only absorb so many stories of excess greed when they and myself alike, are watching pennies so we can put groceries on our tables and out there fighting for market share in business, that is if we have a job. Today's glaring headline of excess and greed that all the Media is focused on is "AIG" and the excess of the 73 current and former executives a bonus of $1,000,000 each ( I had to type that out just so it looked as gross as it sounded with all those zeros. Writing one million just doesn't have the same effect). So, now we have total public outrage as well as we should since "we; John Q public" is footing the bill for those 73 in addition to the others that didn't make the headline news. However since the story broke late Thursday, it has built up steam that brought President Obama into the media fire on Monday morning when his speech brought promises to do what could be done to NOT distribute those bonuses. However, since most people don't really read what is going on fully, they didn't read or listen to the full details that were broadcasted last Thursday stating that the bonuses had to be paid on Sunday, the 15th or they were liable for legal action. So, Monday's statement was really nothing more that of continuing to feed the frenzy that as I type this out is still being played out in the public by the media and our administration. ( Don't get me wrong, I like Obama and wouldn't want his job for anything!! That is a Toxic Media frenzy in the making.... ). However.... However.... One can not tell me, that OUR Government was NOT aware of the fact that when they bailed out AIG on both occasions that they didn't have a summary of expenses due for the next 48 months or more? That they didn't know of the obligations that AIG had committed to previously? Were they not aware of their operating statement? Had not taken the time to review the companies finances totally before writing them a very large check out of our checkbook? If that is the case, then shame on our Government!! I remember last year when things really went sideways. It started with the AIG bailout and allowing Lehman Brothers to collapse on September 16th. That was the beginning of what I call all the "Toxic Media" that along with our open check book, lack of due diligence that has fed the current economic crisis.

So, I say, ignore the "Toxic Media" and focus on the small positive news that is starting to eek out of the pack and eventually will beging to take over and lead the news and assist in building consumer confidence. The hardest part is going to be patient for that change to come about. But patience, ear plugs and the mute button on your remote control will pay off sooner.

Robin Weirich CBW

e-PropertyLinks

Saturday, November 22, 2008




If you can't register today, please flag this email. We don't want you to miss your opportunity to attend what could be one of the most valuable real estate conferences ever!
Inman News is putting together what looks to be their best Real Estate Connect conference yet this January in New York. Real Estate Connect offers the strongest content in the industry, with stellar keynotes, panelists, case studies, and interactive forums, plus incredible opportunities for shared learning and networking. Here's a sample of what's in store for you this year:

"Finding a Fix for the Housing Market." A presentation from Robert Shiller, Professor of Economics, Yale University & Co-Founder of the S&P/Case Shiller Home Price Index & MacroMarkets

"What's Up With Wall Street?" A presentation from Andrew Ross Sorkin, Founder and Editor of Dealbook & Chief Reporter on Mergers and Acquisitions, The New York Times

"Finding Capital to Fund Your Dreams" A conversation with Fred Wilson, Venture Capitalist, Union Square Ventures and Jordan Levy, Partner, Softbank.

"Building Your Personal Brand in Challenging Times" A presentation from Gary Vaynerchuk, Founder & Director of Operations, WineLibrary.tv

Real Estate Connect NYC 2009 has assembled the best speakers and cutting edge topics to help you get through the most challenging market in history. Click here to see the full conference program.

E-Property Links members can get a discount of $190 off conference registration by using the promo code "EPL"

Click Here to Register

Inman Premium Members can save another $100 off registration!



ABOUT INMAN NEWS:

Inman News (www.inman.com) is the nation's leading independent real estate media news service and content provider. Inman’s clients include 50,000+ Web sites and 250+ U.S. newspapers, including The Los Angeles Times, Chicago Tribune, Miami Herald, Washington Post, Denver Post, San Francisco Chronicle, Google, MSN, Yahoo! and RealEstateJournal.com.

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Henry’s Paulsons Newest 700 Billion Defensive Comments

Henry’s Paulsons Newest 700 Billion Defensive Comments
November 15, 2008 · 4 Comments>
Today, I wanted to take a moment to touch on excerpts of this weeks interview with Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson’s interview defending his decision to change how the $700 billion financial bailout fund is used, telling CNBC that the spreading credit crisis forced the government to focus on injecting capital directly into banks instead of buying up toxic mortgage assets. ( I will share at a later date, my personal thoughts on the mortgage shake up - Robin Weirich, e-Propertylinks.)
Paulson stated in his interview. “We have this limited pool of resources—big, but limited, $700 billion; how do we use that, to gain maximum impact, is by putting capital in (banks).” He also said the money could be used to shore up markets for scrutinized consumer debt such as car loans, student loans and credit cards, which could help restore credit flows to U.S. households. What changed was when we saw the commercial paper markets freeze up altogether, so good, mainstream corporations weren’t able to raise money. For more on this statement, click:
Paulson told a news conference on Wednesday .
Setting up a system to buy up the bad mortgage debt from financial institutions also had become cumbersome, and Paulson said the Treasury needed to act quickly to stabilize the credit markets. As a result, the Treasury began to use the fund—known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP—to inject capital directly into banks.
“The major purpose of the TARPwas to stabilize the financial system, first and foremost, and the number two, to get lending going,” Paulson added. “I think the system has been stabilized. I don’t think people are going to bed at night wondering which major financial institution might have a problem.” ( Itotally disagree! - Robin Weirich )
Still, the change in strategy has been sharply criticized in Congress and Wall Street. Earlier Friday, a House committee took one of Paulson’s deputies, Neel Kashkari, to task for what one member said was “a bait and switch.” Paulson again deflected such criticism, saying he was obligated to change strategies as the situation changed. “You’re never going to get me to apologize for being so prudent as to change a strategy when the facts change, and to do it in a way that protects the taxpayer,” he said
( We have all figured out, he isn’t going to admit that his administration made any errors in Judgement in the moves they took or that the knee jerk reactions they took daily enabled this crisis to escalate to the levels it is today - Robin Weirich, e-PropertyLinks ) Please either post your comments on this bailout plan or e-mail me directly at Robin Weirich
Robin Weirich CBW
e-PropertyLinks